![]() In my opinion, the body and style of this guitar would be geared more towards rock players, where a 335 would be more suited towards blues and jazz styles. The feedback is considerably reduced, the guitar feels more comfortable to play standing up, and the overall tone is very different punchier and more defined, while retaining the woody and airy nature of a semi hollow. For me, this was the reason to get into ES style guitars, as the 335 had never felt comfortable, was a little dark, and I struggled with feedback when playing those. A tad bigger than a Les Paul, it is considerably smaller than an ES335, and has a solid maple block down the middle of the guitar. The ES339’s distinguishing feature is it’s smaller body. I’ve had it for a couple of weeks now, and I’ve ran it through the paces. I’ve only ever played this guitar through a Fender Blues Jr ltd edition with Jensen speaker and sparkle mod. ![]() I do have a bias towards Gibson guitars I have three, and I dig them, that’s no secret. I use it as part of my guitar stable, along side a strat, gretsch, les paul, and a few acoustics. In the spirit of remaining transparent, please note that this guitar was bought on the fly, with no prior research, or preconcieved notion of the guitar. Ib.I've taken a pretty good review of the 339 from another forum for your info.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |